Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Step 3.7 Flash (high) vs GLM 5.3 (low)

Step 3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 6.8 vs 6.8. GLM 5.3 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.257 vs $1.229. GLM 5.3 (low) is faster at 13.65s vs 70.10s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#129
Total Output Tokens
1,050,900
Response Time (avg)
70.10s
Total Cost
$1.229
Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
24,808
Response Time (avg)
13.65s
Total Cost
$0.257
Recommended model GLM 5.3 (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.8 vs 6.8), while costing about 4.8x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-05-29 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 low Release: 2026-08-20
Score 6.8 6.8
Rank #129 #134
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.4 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 11.167 2.135
Total Cost $1.229 $0.257
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $1.150 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,700 104,989
Output Tokens 1,050,900 8,532
Reasoning Tokens 0 16,276
Response Time (avg) 70.10s 13.65s
Response Time (max) 364.99s 83.60s
Response Time (total) 1542.14s 300.22s
Parameters 198B total (11B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#129 Step 3.7 Flash

high
Cost
$0.007
Time
63.6s
Tokens
6,030 tok

#134 GLM 5.3

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
28.4s
Tokens
1,599 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Step 3.7 Flash 4.0 6.0 22.2% 1 206.21s 6,057 327,340 0
GLM 5.3 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 21.02s 7,317 368 6,764

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair