Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) vs Step 3.7 Flash (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 6.9. Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.738 vs $1.207. Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) is faster at 44.65s vs 64.68s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#93
Total Output Tokens
634,338
Response Time (avg)
44.65s
Total Cost
$0.738
Rank
#94
Total Output Tokens
1,032,395
Response Time (avg)
64.68s
Total Cost
$1.207
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 1.6x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-05-29
Score 6.9 6.9
Rank #93 #94
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 63.6%
Flaky tests 5 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.784 10.973
Total Cost $0.738 $1.207
Input Price $0.188 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.125 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,041 98,691
Output Tokens 20,026 1,032,395
Reasoning Tokens 614,312 0
Response Time (avg) 44.65s 64.68s
Response Time (max) 578.13s 364.99s
Response Time (total) 982.32s 1423.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#93 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

#94 Step 3.7 Flash

high
Cost
$0.007
Time
63.6s
Tokens
6,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967
Step 3.7 Flash 4.0 6.0 22.2% 1 206.21s 6,057 327,340 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair