Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash (medium)

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on average score with 7.0 vs 6.9. Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.738 vs $1.079. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 9.93s vs 44.65s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#87
Total Output Tokens
117,518
Response Time (avg)
9.93s
Total Cost
$1.079
Rank
#93
Total Output Tokens
634,338
Response Time (avg)
44.65s
Total Cost
$0.738
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash

It has the best score here (7.0), while responding about 4.5x faster than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash none Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.0 6.9
Rank #87 #93
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.190 6.784
Total Cost $1.079 $0.738
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 13,843 129,041
Output Tokens 117,518 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 0 614,312
Response Time (avg) 9.93s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 64.36s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 178.68s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#87 Gemini 3.5 Flash

none
Cost
$0.225
Time
125.5s
Tokens
25,004 tok

#93 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 34.69s 8,122 75,927 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair