Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Solar Pro 4 (medium) vs GLM 5.3 (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.8 vs 6.8. Solar Pro 4 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.047 vs $0.257. GLM 5.3 (low) is faster at 13.65s vs 127.64s, with pass rates of 62.1% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#132
Total Output Tokens
366,411
Response Time (avg)
127.64s
Total Cost
$0.047
Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
24,808
Response Time (avg)
13.65s
Total Cost
$0.257
Recommended model Solar Pro 4 (medium)

It has the best score here (6.8), while costing about 5.5x less than GLM 5.3 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 4 medium Release: 2026-08-11 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 low Release: 2026-08-20
Score 6.8 6.8
Rank #132 #134
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 62.1% 65.2%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.389 2.135
Total Cost $0.047 $0.257
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $0.120 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,902 104,989
Output Tokens 30,743 8,532
Reasoning Tokens 335,668 16,276
Response Time (avg) 127.64s 13.65s
Response Time (max) 519.91s 83.60s
Response Time (total) 2808.09s 300.22s
Parameters ~100B 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#132 Solar Pro 4

medium
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#134 GLM 5.3

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
28.4s
Tokens
1,599 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Solar Pro 4 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 310.39s 6,960 24,549 98,680
GLM 5.3 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 21.02s 7,317 368 6,764

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair