Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs GLM 5.3 (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.7 vs 6.8. GLM 5.3 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.257 vs $0.487. GLM 5.3 (low) is faster at 13.65s vs 26.01s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
139,572
Response Time (avg)
26.01s
Total Cost
$0.487
Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
24,808
Response Time (avg)
13.65s
Total Cost
$0.257
Recommended model GLM 5.3 (low)

It has the best score here (6.8), while costing about 1.9x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5.

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none Release: 2026-07-14 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 low Release: 2026-08-20
Score 6.7 6.8
Rank #139 #134
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.0 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 65.2%
Flaky tests 8 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.419 2.135
Total Cost $0.487 $0.257
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,508 104,989
Output Tokens 139,572 8,532
Reasoning Tokens 0 16,276
Response Time (avg) 26.01s 13.65s
Response Time (max) 335.41s 83.60s
Response Time (total) 572.22s 300.22s
Parameters ~700B total (~72B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#139 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
29.0s
Tokens
3,439 tok

#134 GLM 5.3

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
28.4s
Tokens
1,599 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 22.52s 7,893 22,440 0
GLM 5.3 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 21.02s 7,317 368 6,764

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair