- Score
- 7.5 (+1.17 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s · 48.2% faster
Xiaomi
Release: 2026-04-22
Tested on: 2026-10-01 02:09
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro::medium
1.02T total (42B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 6.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #248. It has 10.0 reliability, a 63.8% pass rate, $0.332 total cost, and 56.72s average response time.
What makes MiMo-V2.5-Pro unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #3, while Domain specific is its weakest area at #14.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 9.4 (+2.99 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 45.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 89.0% faster
- Score
- 8.6 (+2.20 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 81.8% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 86.8% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 1.02T total (42B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
6.4
Consistency
7.6
10.0
Total Output Tokens
223,971
Total Input Tokens
253,462
Input Price
$0.435 / 1M
Output Price
$0.870 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.004 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
7
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#248 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 02:09 Re-test | 6.4 | 10.0 | $0.332 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:50 New test added | 6.9 | 10.0 | $0.187 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:52 New test added | 7.5 | 10.0 | $0.106 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-08 15:28 Suite changed | 8.1 | 10.0 | $0.200 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-22 22:54 First recorded run | 8.1 | N/A | $0.201 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.435 / 1M | $0.870 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $0.435 / 1M | $0.870 / 1M | $0.004 / 1M | N/A |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
MiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashminimalMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsDots 3 Note PreviewhighFree AvailableMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsMercury 2.5mediumMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsDots 3 Note PreviewlowFree AvailableMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsBeam 1.0 501B A23BlowMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsLongCat 2.0noneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsKimi K2.5mediumMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsMinimax M3.1 FlashxhighFree AvailableMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsQwen3.6 27Bnone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 6.2 | 4.7 | |
| Combined | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 9.9 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.7 | 7.9 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |