Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.8. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.187 vs $0.300. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 33.92s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.8 vs 6.9), while responding about 12.8x faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.8 6.9
Rank #85 #81
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 66.7%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.138 3.218
Total Cost $0.300 $0.187
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 100,753 139,883
Output Tokens 16,454 15,521
Reasoning Tokens 0 130,992
Response Time (avg) 2.65s 33.92s
Response Time (max) 25.26s 197.54s
Response Time (total) 58.27s 746.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#85 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

#81 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair