Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 7.0 vs 6.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.300 vs $0.600. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 99.00s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 65.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.8 vs 7.0), while costing about 2.0x less than Kimi K2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27
Score 6.8 7.0
Rank #85 #74
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 65.2%
Flaky tests 1 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.138 4.789
Total Cost $0.300 $0.600
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.571 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $2.850 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 100,753 118,448
Output Tokens 16,454 62,124
Reasoning Tokens 0 165,243
Response Time (avg) 2.65s 99.00s
Response Time (max) 25.26s 281.00s
Response Time (total) 58.27s 1485.04s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#85 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

#74 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair