#152 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Xiaomi
Release: 2026-04-22
Tested on: 2026-08-14 02:43
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro::medium
1.02T total (42B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 6.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #152. It has 10.0 reliability, a 63.6% pass rate, $0.221 total cost, and 48.68s average response time.
What makes MiMo-V2.5-Pro unique: It stands out most in Instructions following, where it ranks #4, while Domain specific is its weakest area at #13.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 1.02T total (42B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
6.8
Consistency
7.9
10.0
Total Output Tokens
185,466
Total Input Tokens
139,892
Input Price
$0.435 / 1M
Output Price
$0.870 / 1M
Flaky tests
6
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:43 Re-test | 6.8 | 10.0 | $0.221 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:50 New test added | 6.9 | 10.0 | $0.187 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:52 New test added | 7.5 | 10.0 | $0.106 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-08 15:28 Suite changed | 8.1 | 10.0 | $0.200 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-22 22:54 First recorded run | 8.1 | N/A | $0.201 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:43 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 6.8 | 7.9 | 10.0 | 11/22 | 6 | 185,466 | 139,892 | $0.221 | 48.68s |
| 2026-07-16 22:50 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 6.9 | 8.2 | 10.0 | 12/22 | 5 | 146,513 | 139,883 | $0.187 | 33.92s |
| Difference | — | -0.1 | -0.3 | 0.0 | -1 | +1 | +38953 | +9 | +$0.034 | +14765ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.435 / 1M | $0.870 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
MiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGLM 5.3lowMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGemini 3 Flash PreviewnoneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsDeepSeek V4 PrononeMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailableMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsSolar Pro 4mediumMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGLM 5.2noneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsSolar Pro 4lowMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5noneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsSeed-2.0-CodemediumMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsLongCat 2.0low
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 6.2 | 4.7 | |
| Combined | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 9.9 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.7 | 7.9 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |