#152 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Xiaomi
Release: 2026-04-22
Tested on: 2026-08-14 02:43
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro::medium
1.02T total (42B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 6.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #152. It has 10.0 reliability, a 63.6% pass rate, $0.221 total cost, and 48.68s average response time.
What makes MiMo-V2.5-Pro unique: It stands out most in Instructions following, where it ranks #4, while Domain specific is its weakest area at #13.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 1.02T total (42B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
6.8
Consistency
7.9
10.0
Total Output Tokens
185,466
Total Input Tokens
139,892
Input Price
$0.435 / 1M
Output Price
$0.870 / 1M
Flaky tests
6
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:43 Re-test | 6.8 | 10.0 | $0.221 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:50 New test added | 6.9 | 10.0 | $0.187 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:52 New test added | 7.5 | 10.0 | $0.106 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-08 15:28 Suite changed | 8.1 | 10.0 | $0.200 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-22 22:54 First recorded run | 8.1 | N/A | $0.201 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:43 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 6.8 | 7.9 | 10.0 | 11/22 | 6 | 185,466 | 139,892 | $0.221 | 48.68s |
| 2026-06-04 13:52 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 7.5 | 8.5 | 10.0 | 12/21 | 4 | 102,757 | 40,854 | $0.106 | 26.13s |
| Difference | — | -0.7 | -0.6 | 0.0 | -1 | +2 | +82709 | +99038 | +$0.116 | +22557ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.435 / 1M | $0.870 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
MiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGLM 5.3lowMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGemini 3 Flash PreviewnoneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsDeepSeek V4 PrononeMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailableMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsSolar Pro 4mediumMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGLM 5.2noneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsSolar Pro 4lowMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5noneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsSeed-2.0-CodemediumMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsLongCat 2.0low
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 6.2 | 4.7 | |
| Combined | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 9.9 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.7 | 7.9 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |