Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.7. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.187 vs $0.391. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) is faster at 33.92s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium)It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 2.1x less than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.7 6.9
Rank #96 #88
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 66.7%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.910 3.218
Total Cost $0.391 $0.187
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,909 139,883
Output Tokens 5,679 15,521
Reasoning Tokens 297,369 130,992
Response Time (avg) 100.31s 33.92s
Response Time (max) 560.39s 197.54s
Response Time (total) 2206.82s 746.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

#88 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair