Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

LongCat 2.0 (low) vs GLM 5.2

The average score is effectively tied at 6.7 vs 6.7. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.153 vs $0.412. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.65s vs 113.61s, with pass rates of 54.6% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-03

Rank
#152
Total Output Tokens
320,594
Response Time (avg)
113.61s
Total Cost
$0.412
Rank
#150
Total Output Tokens
14,344
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.153
Recommended model GLM 5.2

It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 2.7x less than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.7 6.7
Rank #152 #150
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 54.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.120 1.312
Total Cost $0.412 $0.153
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,870 112,458
Output Tokens 5,676 14,344
Reasoning Tokens 314,918 0
Response Time (avg) 113.61s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 560.39s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 2499.46s 212.38s
Parameters 1.6T total (48B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#152 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

#150 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair