Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

LongCat 2.0 (low) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.128 vs $0.391. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.34s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 59.1%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2Its score stays close to the best score here (6.6 vs 6.7), while costing about 3.1x less than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.7 6.6
Rank #96 #101
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 59.1%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 64
Cost per result 3.910 1.421
Total Cost $0.391 $0.128
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.808 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $2.539 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,909 112,359
Output Tokens 5,679 14,340
Reasoning Tokens 297,369 0
Response Time (avg) 100.31s 9.34s
Response Time (max) 560.39s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 2206.82s 205.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

#101 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair