Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.7. LongCat 2.0 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.391 vs $1.207. Step 3.7 Flash (high) is faster at 64.68s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 63.6%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0 (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.9), while costing about 3.1x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-05-29
Score 6.7 6.9
Rank #96 #90
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 63.6%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.910 10.973
Total Cost $0.391 $1.207
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,909 98,691
Output Tokens 5,679 1,032,395
Reasoning Tokens 297,369 0
Response Time (avg) 100.31s 64.68s
Response Time (max) 560.39s 364.99s
Response Time (total) 2206.82s 1423.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

#90 Step 3.7 Flash

high
Cost
$0.007
Time
63.6s
Tokens
6,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627
Step 3.7 Flash 4.0 6.0 22.2% 1 206.21s 6,057 327,340 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair