Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) vs Step 3.7 Flash (high)

Step 3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.7. Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.746 vs $1.207. Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) is faster at 58.06s vs 64.68s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
740,585
Response Time (avg)
58.06s
Total Cost
$0.746
Rank
#94
Total Output Tokens
1,032,395
Response Time (avg)
64.68s
Total Cost
$1.207
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.9), while costing about 1.6x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-05-29
Score 6.7 6.9
Rank #98 #94
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.712 10.973
Total Cost $0.746 $1.207
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 85,139 98,691
Output Tokens 61,819 1,032,395
Reasoning Tokens 678,766 0
Response Time (avg) 58.06s 64.68s
Response Time (max) 817.57s 364.99s
Response Time (total) 1161.18s 1423.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#98 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#94 Step 3.7 Flash

high
Cost
$0.007
Time
63.6s
Tokens
6,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223
Step 3.7 Flash 4.0 6.0 22.2% 1 206.21s 6,057 327,340 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair