- Score
- 8.6 (+2.07 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 92.7% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 87.5% faster
Summary
Qwen3.6 35B A3B scores 6.5 on AI BENCHY and ranks #238. It has 10.0 reliability, a 58.0% pass rate, $0.834 total cost, and 59.92s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.6 35B A3B unique: It stands out most in Instructions following, where it ranks #1, while Combined is its weakest area at #14. It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 9.4 (+2.86 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 78.1% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 89.6% faster
- Score
- 8.3 (+1.76 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.047 · 94.4% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 18.07s · 69.8% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 35B total (3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
6.5
Consistency
9.0
10.0
Total Output Tokens
769,570
Total Input Tokens
282,192
Input Price
$0.150 / 1M
Output Price
$1.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.050 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#238 Qwen3.6 35B A3B
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 00:45 Re-test | 6.5 | 10.0 | $0.834 ↑ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:06 New test added | 6.7 | 10.0 | $0.746 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:20 New test added | 7.4 | 10.0 | $0.146 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:02 Suite changed | 7.8 | 9.4 | $0.126 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-27 23:06 Initial run | 8.8 | 10.0 | $0.104 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.140 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.150 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $0.150 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M | $0.050 / 1M | N/A |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 6.1 | 3.1 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.4 | 9.9 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 8.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |