#176 Qwen3.6 35B A3B
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Qwen
Release: 2026-04-20
Tested on: 2026-08-14 01:44
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b::medium
35B total (3B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Qwen3.6 35B A3B scores 6.6 on AI BENCHY and ranks #176. It has 10.0 reliability, a 57.6% pass rate, $0.672 total cost, and 58.49s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.6 35B A3B unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #3, while Combined is its weakest area at #12. It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 35B total (3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
6.6
Consistency
9.2
10.0
Total Output Tokens
743,292
Total Input Tokens
85,148
Input Price
$0.100 / 1M
Output Price
$0.900 / 1M
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:44 Re-test | 6.6 | 10.0 | $0.672 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:06 New test added | 6.7 | 10.0 | $0.746 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:20 New test added | 7.4 | 10.0 | $0.146 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:02 Suite changed | 7.8 | 9.4 | $0.126 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-27 23:06 Initial run | 8.8 | 10.0 | $0.104 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:44 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 6.6 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 12/22 | 2 | 743,292 | 85,148 | $0.672 | 58.49s |
| 2026-07-16 22:06 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 6.7 | 9.6 | 10.0 | 13/22 | 1 | 740,585 | 85,139 | $0.746 | 58.06s |
| Difference | — | -0.1 | -0.4 | 0.0 | -1 | +1 | +2707 | +9 | -$0.075 | +433ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.140 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.150 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| 2026-08-29 08:22 | $0.100 / 1M | $0.900 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsMercury 2.5 PreviewhighQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsInkling SmallmediumQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsQwen3.6 27BmediumQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsQwen3.5-27BnoneQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsLaguna XS 2.1mediumFree AvailableQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Previewnone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.4 | 9.9 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 8.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |