Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.6. Beam 1.0 501B A23B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.499 vs $0.834. Beam 1.0 501B A23B (medium) is faster at 6.27s vs 59.92s, with pass rates of 58.0% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-17

Compared models

Rank
#223
Total Output Tokens
769,570
Response Time (avg)
59.92s
Total Cost
$0.834
Rank
#220
Total Output Tokens
98,521
Response Time (avg)
6.27s
Total Cost
$0.499
Recommended model Beam 1.0 501B A23B (medium)

It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20 Beam 1.0 501B A23B Beam 1.0 501B A23B medium Release: 2026-10-17
Score 6.5 6.6
Rank #223 #220
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 9.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 58.0% 65.2%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 6.732 3.561
Total Cost $0.834 $0.499
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $3.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.050 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 282,192 202,937
Output Tokens 75,306 4,328
Reasoning Tokens 700,868 94,193
Response Time (avg) 59.92s 6.27s
Response Time (max) 817.57s 31.55s
Response Time (total) 1258.32s 144.28s
Parameters 35B total (3B active) 501B total (23B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#223 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#220 Beam 1.0 501B A23B

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
11.8s
Tokens
4,267 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223
Beam 1.0 501B A23B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.81s 7,791 440 27,204

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowvsBeam 1.0 501B A23BmediumBeam 1.0 501B A23BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashhighMercury 2.5 PreviewhighvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumMercury 2.5highvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsBeam 1.0 501B A23BxhighQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsGLM 5.3lowLongCat 2.0lowvsBeam 1.0 501B A23BmediumQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsGLM 5.1noneKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashhighMercury 2.5 PreviewhighvsBeam 1.0 501B A23Bmedium