Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.300 vs $0.738. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 44.65s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.8 vs 6.9), while costing about 2.5x less than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.8 6.9
Rank #88 #85
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.138 6.784
Total Cost $0.300 $0.738
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 100,753 129,041
Output Tokens 16,454 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 0 614,312
Response Time (avg) 2.65s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 25.26s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 58.27s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#88 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

#85 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair