Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on average score with 7.0 vs 6.9. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.187 vs $1.079. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 9.93s vs 33.92s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.9 vs 7.0), while costing about 5.8x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash none Release: 2026-05-19 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 7.0 6.9
Rank #76 #81
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 66.7%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.190 3.218
Total Cost $1.079 $0.187
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 13,843 139,883
Output Tokens 117,518 15,521
Reasoning Tokens 0 130,992
Response Time (avg) 9.93s 33.92s
Response Time (max) 64.36s 197.54s
Response Time (total) 178.68s 746.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#76 Gemini 3.5 Flash

none
Cost
$0.225
Time
125.5s
Tokens
25,004 tok

#81 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 34.69s 8,122 75,927 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair