Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Laguna S 2.1 (medium) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.2. Laguna S 2.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.059 vs $0.147. Inkling is faster at 3.50s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 28.8%.

Recommended modelInklingIts score stays close to the best score here (5.2 vs 5.4), while responding about 16.7x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Inkling Inkling none Release: 2026-07-18
Score 5.4 5.2
Rank #164 #172
Reliability 9.8 9.9
Consistency 8.4 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 28.8%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.451 2.448
Total Cost $0.059 $0.147
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 86,641 104,111
Output Tokens 97,298 10,551
Reasoning Tokens 242,297 0
Response Time (avg) 58.43s 3.50s
Response Time (max) 560.31s 48.02s
Response Time (total) 1285.48s 77.09s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

#172 Thinking Machines: Inkling

none
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
5.3s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718
Inkling 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.01s 7,356 436 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair