Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (medium) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 4.8. Ring-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.059. Ring-2.6-1T is faster at 55.10s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelLaguna S 2.1 (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-05-10 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.8 5.4
Rank #194 #170
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 9.3 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 25.8%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 1.451
Total Cost $0.026 $0.059
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 7,599 86,641
Output Tokens 39,954 97,298
Reasoning Tokens 0 242,297
Response Time (avg) 55.10s 58.43s
Response Time (max) 143.82s 560.31s
Response Time (total) 881.55s 1285.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#194 Ring-2.6-1T

none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#170 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 143.82s 834 5,036 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair