Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Ling 3.0 Flash leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.5. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.164. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 6.70s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.1It has the best overall balance of score, reliability, cost, and response time in this comparison.

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 5.7 5.5
Rank #149 #159
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 40.9%
Flaky tests 0 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 2.368
Total Cost $0.000 $0.164
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 124,209
Output Tokens 12,783 14,393
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 6.70s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 61.20s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 147.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#159 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair