Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Ling 3.0 Flash leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.4. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.059. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelLing 3.0 FlashIt has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 16.9x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.7 5.4
Rank #149 #166
Reliability 9.9 9.8
Consistency 10.0 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 25.8%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 1.451
Total Cost $0.000 $0.059
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 86,641
Output Tokens 12,783 97,298
Reasoning Tokens 0 242,297
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 58.43s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 560.31s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 1285.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#166 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair