Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

Ling 3.0 Flash leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.4. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.041. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 10.09s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelLing 3.0 FlashIt has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 2.9x faster than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14
Score 5.7 5.4
Rank #149 #167
Reliability 9.9 9.9
Consistency 10.0 7.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 45.5%
Flaky tests 0 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.585
Total Cost $0.000 $0.041
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 61,085
Output Tokens 12,783 5,905
Reasoning Tokens 0 46,990
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 10.09s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 86.23s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 222.03s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#167 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Cost
$0.004
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,008 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair