Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

North Mini Code vs Ling 3.0 Flash

North Mini Code (medium) leads on average score with 5.9 vs 5.7. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 137.11s, with pass rates of 48.5% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelLing 3.0 FlashIts score stays close to the best score here (5.7 vs 5.9), while responding about 39.7x faster than North Mini Code (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric North Mini Code North Mini Code medium Release: 2026-06-18 Free Available Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available
Score 5.9 5.7
Rank #144 #149
Reliability 8.6 9.9
Consistency 8.5 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 48.5% 27.3%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 58 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.000 $0.000
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 81,813 124,176
Output Tokens 424,772 12,783
Reasoning Tokens 1,342,029 0
Response Time (avg) 137.11s 3.46s
Response Time (max) 786.72s 17.51s
Response Time (total) 3016.42s 76.06s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#144 North Mini Code

medium
Cost
$0.000
Time
51.8s
Tokens
12,460 tok

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
North Mini Code 4.5 4.9 33.3% 2 320.43s 7,119 219,891 561,569
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair