Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Ling-2.6-1T leads on average score with 5.3 vs 4.7. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.032. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 8.58s vs 9.61s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-1TIt has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 2.1x less than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 5.3 4.7
Rank #176 #202
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 27.3%
Flaky tests 0 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 0.793
Total Cost $0.016 $0.032
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 148,194
Output Tokens 11,555 19,069
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 9.61s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 81.80s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#176 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#202 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair