Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Inception: Mercury 2 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.6. Mercury 2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.030 vs $0.032. Mercury 2 is faster at 829ms vs 9.61s, with pass rates of 22.7% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelMercury 2Its score stays close to the best score here (4.6 vs 4.7), while responding about 11.6x faster than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Mercury 2 Mercury 2 none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 4.6 4.7
Rank #185 #183
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 22.7% 27.3%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.734 0.793
Total Cost $0.030 $0.032
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.750 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 88,704 148,194
Output Tokens 9,564 19,069
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 829ms 9.61s
Response Time (max) 4.52s 81.80s
Response Time (total) 18.24s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#185 Mercury 2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
1.8s
Tokens
1,514 tok

#183 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 3.4 9.6 0.0% 0 1.03s 7,229 3,088 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair