Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) vs GLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.7. GLM 4.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.032. GLM 4.7 Flash is faster at 9.15s vs 9.61s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#209
Total Output Tokens
19,069
Response Time (avg)
9.61s
Total Cost
$0.032
Rank
#197
Total Output Tokens
22,992
Response Time (avg)
9.15s
Total Cost
$0.016
Recommended model GLM 4.7 Flash

It has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 2.1x less than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash none Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.7 4.9
Rank #209 #197
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 34.9%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.793 0.256
Total Cost $0.032 $0.016
Input Price $0.110 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 148,194 101,504
Output Tokens 19,069 22,992
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 9.61s 9.15s
Response Time (max) 81.80s 97.15s
Response Time (total) 153.69s 137.18s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#209 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#197 GLM 4.7 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 2.54s 7,256 650 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair