Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Summary

Cobuddy vs GLM 4.7 Flash benchmark comparison: The average score is effectively tied at 4.9 vs 4.9. Cobuddy has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.004. GLM 4.7 Flash is faster at 2.86s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 36.5%.

Recommended model: GLM 4.7 Flash - It has the best score here (4.9), while responding about 14.0x faster than Cobuddy.

Last updated at: 2026-06-18

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash none Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.9 4.9
Rank #140 #141
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 36.5%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.056
Total Cost $0.000 $0.004
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 38,745
Output Tokens 1,677 2,521
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 2.86s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 7.05s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 40.04s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#140 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#141 GLM 4.7 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
GLM 4.7 Flash 5.2 7.9 41.7% 1 5.51s 555 438 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 2.54s 7,256 650 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.22s 14,325 704 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
GLM 4.7 Flash 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 4.82s 7,107 196 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
GLM 4.7 Flash 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 744ms 687 19 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.59s 477 134 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
GLM 4.7 Flash 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 888ms 636 62 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
GLM 4.7 Flash 6.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.20s 609 97 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
GLM 4.7 Flash 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 7.05s 6,907 212 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 692ms 186 9 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair