Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Cobuddy (medium) vs GPT-5.4 Nano

GPT-5.4 Nano leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.7. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.041. GPT-5.4 Nano is faster at 2.57s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 28.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#210
Total Output Tokens
118,380
Response Time (avg)
39.90s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#201
Total Output Tokens
13,794
Response Time (avg)
2.57s
Total Cost
$0.041
Recommended model GPT-5.4 Nano

It has the best score here (4.8), while responding about 15.5x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano none Release: 2026-03-17
Score 4.7 4.8
Rank #210 #201
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.2 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 28.8%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.000 1.011
Total Cost $0.000 $0.041
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 115,924
Output Tokens 1,677 13,794
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 2.57s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 25.50s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 56.51s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#210 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#201 GPT-5.4 Nano

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
46.1s
Tokens
5,735 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
GPT-5.4 Nano 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,305 613 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair