Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Cobuddy vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Cobuddy (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.5. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.025. Laguna S 2.1 is faster at 11.67s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 15.2%.

Recommended modelLaguna S 2.1Its score stays close to the best score here (4.5 vs 4.7), while responding about 3.4x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.7 4.5
Rank #197 #200
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.2 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 15.2%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.000 1.205
Total Cost $0.000 $0.025
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 125,598
Output Tokens 1,677 57,634
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 11.67s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 200.52s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 256.80s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#197 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#200 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair