Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5 vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

The average score is effectively tied at 4.6 vs 4.5. Laguna S 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.340. Laguna S 2.1 is faster at 11.67s vs 68.27s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 15.2%.

Recommended modelLaguna S 2.1It has the best score here (4.5), while costing about 14.1x less than MiniMax M2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium Release: 2026-02-12 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.6 4.5
Rank #199 #200
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.2 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 15.2%
Flaky tests 10 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.648 1.205
Total Cost $0.340 $0.025
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.900 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,561 125,598
Output Tokens 125,442 57,634
Reasoning Tokens 339,935 0
Response Time (avg) 68.27s 11.67s
Response Time (max) 251.36s 200.52s
Response Time (total) 955.75s 256.80s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#199 MiniMax M2.5

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#200 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 3.4 9.1 0.0% 0 188.58s 6,076 357 106,177
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair