Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Laguna S 2.1 leads on average score with 4.5 vs 4.3. Laguna S 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.166. Laguna S 2.1 is faster at 11.67s vs 142.59s, with pass rates of 15.2% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelLaguna S 2.1It has the best score here (4.5), while costing about 6.9x less than GLM 4.7 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.5 4.3
Rank #200 #204
Reliability 10.0 7.8
Consistency 8.8 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 15.2% 31.8%
Flaky tests 3 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.205 4.147
Total Cost $0.025 $0.166
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.061 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,598 79,051
Output Tokens 57,634 43,754
Reasoning Tokens 0 374,109
Response Time (avg) 11.67s 142.59s
Response Time (max) 200.52s 1539.97s
Response Time (total) 256.80s 1996.21s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#200 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#204 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
186.2s
Tokens
12,112 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair