Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Granite 4.1 8B vs GLM 4.7 Flash (medium)

GLM 4.7 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 4.3 vs 4.0. Granite 4.1 8B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.007 vs $0.166. Granite 4.1 8B is faster at 1.45s vs 142.59s, with pass rates of 9.1% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#224
Total Output Tokens
5,996
Response Time (avg)
1.45s
Total Cost
$0.007
Rank
#217
Total Output Tokens
417,863
Response Time (avg)
142.59s
Total Cost
$0.166
Recommended model Granite 4.1 8B

Its score stays close to the best score here (4.0 vs 4.3), while costing about 26.4x less than GLM 4.7 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Granite 4.1 8B Granite 4.1 8B none Release: 2026-05-01 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.0 4.3
Rank #224 #217
Reliability 10.0 7.8
Consistency 10.0 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 9.1% 31.8%
Flaky tests 0 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.315 4.147
Total Cost $0.007 $0.166
Input Price $0.050 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.100 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 113,827 79,051
Output Tokens 5,996 43,754
Reasoning Tokens 0 374,109
Response Time (avg) 1.45s 142.59s
Response Time (max) 16.67s 1539.97s
Response Time (total) 31.96s 1996.21s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#224 IBM: Granite 4.1 8B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.2s
Tokens
491 tok

#217 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
186.2s
Tokens
12,112 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Granite 4.1 8B 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 775ms 8,344 525 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair