Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MiniMax M2.5 (medium) vs GLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.6. GLM 4.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.327. GLM 4.7 Flash is faster at 8.81s vs 69.08s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 30.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-02

Rank
#278
Total Output Tokens
272,229
Response Time (avg)
69.08s
Total Cost
$0.327
Rank
#269
Total Output Tokens
22,992
Response Time (avg)
8.81s
Total Cost
$0.016
Recommended model GLM 4.7 Flash

It has the best score here (4.8), while costing about 21.4x less than MiniMax M2.5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium Release: 2026-02-12 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash none Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.6 4.8
Rank #278 #269
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.6 8.9
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 30.3%
Flaky tests 9 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.463 0.307
Total Cost $0.327 $0.016
Input Price $0.270 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $1.080 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,621 101,513
Output Tokens 20,409 22,992
Reasoning Tokens 251,820 0
Response Time (avg) 69.08s 8.81s
Response Time (max) 251.36s 97.15s
Response Time (total) 1036.24s 140.88s
Parameters 230B total (10B active) 30B total (3B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#278 MiniMax M2.5

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#269 GLM 4.7 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.5 3.4 9.1 0.0% 0 188.58s 6,076 357 106,177
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 2.54s 7,256 650 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair