- Rank
- #288
- Total Output Tokens
- 932,619
- Response Time (avg)
- 75.86s
- Total Cost
- $0.592
Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs MiniMax M2.5 (medium)
Trinity Large Thinking (high) leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.6. MiniMax M2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.363 vs $0.592. MiniMax M2.5 (medium) is faster at 69.08s vs 75.86s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 43.9%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #300
- Total Output Tokens
- 272,229
- Response Time (avg)
- 69.08s
- Total Cost
- $0.363
Recommended model
MiniMax M2.5 (medium)
Its score stays close to the best score here (4.6 vs 4.8), while costing about 1.6x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high | MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Rank | #288 | #300 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 6.6 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 39.4% | 43.9% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 9 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 12.473 | 6.463 |
| Total Cost | $0.592 | $0.363 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.800 / 1M | $1.200 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 101,776 | 142,621 |
| Output Tokens | 276,367 | 20,409 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 656,252 | 251,820 |
| Response Time (avg) | 75.86s | 69.08s |
| Response Time (max) | 510.21s | 251.36s |
| Response Time (total) | 1668.93s | 1036.24s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | 230B total (10B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Weights available |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#288 Trinity Large Thinking
high- Cost
- $0.028
- Time
- 130.1s
- Tokens
- 34,387 tok
#300 MiniMax M2.5
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.7 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 4.13s | 663 | 3,108 | 7,565 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7.9 | 6.3 | 83.3% | 2 | 20.82s | 612 | 286 | 45,344 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 245.04s | 7,204 | 83,616 | 266,836 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.4 | 9.1 | 0.0% | 0 | 188.58s | 6,076 | 357 | 106,177 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 262.39s | 76,626 | 14,706 | 149,243 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 50.0% | 2 | 83.19s | 119,959 | 16,687 | 18,834 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 13.98s | 6,906 | 580 | 9,338 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 66.7% | 2 | 7.48s | 6,584 | 266 | 3,835 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 66.94s | 756 | 163,364 | 166,091 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 158.88s | 368 | 14 | 45,372 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.90s | 501 | 5,700 | 5,942 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 1 | 6.63s | 492 | 25 | 1,686 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.12s | 684 | 88 | 2,853 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 621ms | 699 | 156 | 1,495 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.7 | 5.2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3.84s | 678 | 2,566 | 3,368 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 11.21s | 495 | 1,069 | 9,605 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.96s | 7,551 | 282 | 1,440 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.35s | 7,123 | 269 | 937 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 125.13s | 207 | 2,357 | 43,576 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 80.79s | 213 | 1,280 | 18,535 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 NanononeTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing-2.6-1TnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneGranite 4.2 8BhighvsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsHy4 previewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneMiniMax M2.5mediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsLing-2.6-flashnoneMercury 2nonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymedium