- Rank
- #288
- Total Output Tokens
- 932,619
- Response Time (avg)
- 75.86s
- Total Cost
- $0.592
Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs Ling-2.6-flash
Ling-2.6-flash leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.8. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.592. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 10.71s vs 75.86s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 30.3%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #282
- Total Output Tokens
- 14,903
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.71s
- Total Cost
- $0.002
Recommended model
Ling-2.6-flash
It has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 371.7x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high | Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.8 | 4.9 |
| Rank | #288 | #282 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 39.4% | 30.3% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 12.473 | 0.024 |
| Total Cost | $0.592 | $0.002 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.010 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.800 / 1M | $0.030 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 101,776 | 114,384 |
| Output Tokens | 276,367 | 14,903 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 656,252 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 75.86s | 10.71s |
| Response Time (max) | 510.21s | 36.03s |
| Response Time (total) | 1668.93s | 214.28s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | 104B total (7.4B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#288 Trinity Large Thinking
high- Cost
- $0.028
- Time
- 130.1s
- Tokens
- 34,387 tok
#282 Ling-2.6-flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.7 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 4.13s | 663 | 3,108 | 7,565 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 245.04s | 7,204 | 83,616 | 266,836 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 262.39s | 76,626 | 14,706 | 149,243 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 13.98s | 6,906 | 580 | 9,338 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 66.94s | 756 | 163,364 | 166,091 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.90s | 501 | 5,700 | 5,942 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.12s | 684 | 88 | 2,853 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.7 | 5.2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3.84s | 678 | 2,566 | 3,368 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.96s | 7,551 | 282 | 1,440 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 125.13s | 207 | 2,357 | 43,576 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 NanononeTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing-2.6-1TnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsHy4 previewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableLing-2.6-flashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2.5 PreviewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2noneLing-2.6-flashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree Available