- Rank
- #288
- Total Output Tokens
- 932,619
- Response Time (avg)
- 75.86s
- Total Cost
- $0.592
Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs Ring-2.6-1T
The average score is effectively tied at 4.8 vs 4.8. Ring-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.592. Ring-2.6-1T is faster at 51.99s vs 75.86s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 45.5%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #285
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,277
- Response Time (avg)
- 51.99s
- Total Cost
- $0.026
Recommended model
Ring-2.6-1T
It has the best score here (4.8), while costing about 23.0x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high | Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Rank | #288 | #285 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 39.4% | 45.5% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 12.473 | 0.037 |
| Total Cost | $0.592 | $0.026 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.075 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.800 / 1M | $0.625 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 101,776 | 7,608 |
| Output Tokens | 276,367 | 40,277 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 656,252 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 75.86s | 51.99s |
| Response Time (max) | 510.21s | 143.82s |
| Response Time (total) | 1668.93s | 831.90s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | 1T total (63B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#288 Trinity Large Thinking
high- Cost
- $0.028
- Time
- 130.1s
- Tokens
- 34,387 tok
#285 Ring-2.6-1T
none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.7 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 4.13s | 663 | 3,108 | 7,565 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 9.2 | 8.4 | 91.7% | 1 | 43.33s | 810 | 5,575 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 245.04s | 7,204 | 83,616 | 266,836 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 143.82s | 834 | 5,036 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 262.39s | 76,626 | 14,706 | 149,243 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 13.98s | 6,906 | 580 | 9,338 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 45.87s | 2,712 | 1,529 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 66.94s | 756 | 163,364 | 166,091 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 56.85s | 882 | 18,051 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.90s | 501 | 5,700 | 5,942 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 4.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 15.63s | 561 | 846 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.12s | 684 | 88 | 2,853 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 27.36s | 774 | 2,004 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.7 | 5.2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3.84s | 678 | 2,566 | 3,368 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 31.47s | 792 | 3,469 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.96s | 7,551 | 282 | 1,440 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 125.13s | 207 | 2,357 | 43,576 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 133.60s | 243 | 3,767 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ring-2.6-1TnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 NanononeTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsHy4 previewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsLing-2.6-flashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2.5 PreviewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2noneCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1Tnone