Navigate
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs Ring 2.6 1t (default)

Trinity Large Thinking (high) leads on average score with 5.7 vs 4.5. Ring 2.6 1t (default) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.794. Ring 2.6 1t (default) is faster at 48.94s vs 74.52s, with pass rates of 42.0% vs 43.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#310
Total Output Tokens
717,762
Response Time (avg)
74.52s
Total Cost
$0.794
Rank
#393
Total Output Tokens
40,277
Response Time (avg)
48.94s
Total Cost
$0.026
Recommended model Trinity Large Thinking (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high Release: 2026-07-28 Ring 2.6 1t Ring 2.6 1t default Release: 2026-05-10
Score 5.7 4.5
Rank #310 #393
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.3 9.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.0% 43.5%
Flaky tests 8 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 11.289 0.037
Total Cost $0.794 $0.026
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.060 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 283,116 7,608
Output Tokens 277,920 17,529
Reasoning Tokens 665,124 34,499
Response Time (avg) 74.52s 48.94s
Response Time (max) 510.21s 143.82s
Response Time (total) 1713.90s 831.92s
Parameters 398B total (13B active) 1T total (63B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#310 Trinity Large Thinking

high
Cost
$0.028
Time
130.1s
Tokens
34,387 tok

#393 Ring 2.6 1t

default
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 3.7 4.7 33.3% 2 245.04s 7,204 83,616 266,836
Ring 2.6 1t 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 143.82s 834 1,071 3,965

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing 2.6 1tmediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5 NanomediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 MininoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMistral Large 4noneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsSeed 2.1 TurbononeRing 2.6 1tdefaultvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsDots 3 Note PreviewmediumFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.6 TerranoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsSpace Bunny AlphalowGranite 4.2 8BnonevsRing 2.6 1tdefault