- Rank
- #273
- Total Output Tokens
- 2,169
- Response Time (avg)
- 2.98s
- Total Cost
- $0.008
Trinity Large Preview vs Qwen3 Coder Next (medium)
Trinity Large Preview leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.6. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.034. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 9.07s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 25.8%.
- Rank
- #280
- Total Output Tokens
- 19,069
- Response Time (avg)
- 9.07s
- Total Cost
- $0.034
Recommended model
Trinity Large Preview
It has the best score here (4.8), while costing about 4.3x less than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none | Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Rank | #273 | #280 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Attempts | 63/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 21.2% | 25.8% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.017 | 1.058 |
| Total Cost | $0.008 | $0.034 |
| Input Price | $0.243 / 1M | $0.120 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.243 / 1M | $0.800 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 29,828 | 148,203 |
| Output Tokens | 2,169 | 19,069 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 2.98s | 9.07s |
| Response Time (max) | 14.34s | 81.80s |
| Response Time (total) | 56.57s | 154.19s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | 80B total (3B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#273 Trinity Large Preview
none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#280 Qwen3 Coder Next
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.07s | 651 | 550 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.5 | 8.1 | 16.7% | 1 | 8.64s | 645 | 1,252 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.7 | 7.7 | 11.1% | 1 | 14.34s | 738 | 397 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.7 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 924ms | 7,185 | 336 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 8.91s | 12,053 | 294 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 14.65s | 121,413 | 16,067 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.26s | 6,900 | 186 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 81.80s | 7,758 | 246 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 877ms | 738 | 25 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 570ms | 762 | 25 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 4.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 873ms | 498 | 104 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 6.3 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.39s | 498 | 142 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 822ms | 678 | 63 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 7.49s | 684 | 63 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.6 | 7.7 | 11.1% | 1 | 1.97s | 669 | 265 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.25s | 678 | 671 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.67s | 6,699 | 267 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.64s | 8,364 | 255 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 777ms | 204 | 18 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 399ms | 216 | 12 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Granite 4.2 8BhighvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumTrinity Large PreviewnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumMercury 2nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumTrinity Large PreviewnonevsGranite 4.2 8BhighQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumTrinity Large PreviewnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGPT-5.4 NanononevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder Nextmedium