Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Trinity Large Preview leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.7. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.032. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 9.61s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelTrinity Large PreviewIt has the best score here (4.8), while costing about 4.1x less than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 4.8 4.7
Rank #179 #183
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 27.3%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 0.793
Total Cost $0.008 $0.032
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 148,194
Output Tokens 2,169 19,069
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 9.61s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 81.80s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#183 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair