#140 Cobuddy
medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Cobuddy vs OpenAI: GPT-5.5
Summary
Cobuddy vs GPT-5.5 benchmark comparison: GPT-5.5 leads on average score with 9.3 vs 4.9. Cobuddy has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.907. GPT-5.5 is faster at 9.76s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 85.7%.
Recommended model: GPT-5.5 - It has the best score here (9.3), while responding about 4.1x faster than Cobuddy.
Last updated at: 2026-06-18
| Metric | Cobuddy Cobuddy medium | GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.9 | 9.3 |
| Rank | #140 | #4 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.5 | 10.0 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 47.6% | 85.7% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 0 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 63 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 5.035 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.907 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $5.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $30.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 37,449 | 34,209 |
| Output Tokens | 1,677 | 2,046 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 116,703 | 22,460 |
| Response Time (avg) | 39.90s | 9.76s |
| Response Time (max) | 309.02s | 56.19s |
| Response Time (total) | 797.98s | 204.92s |
Generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#4 GPT-5.5
low- Cost
- $0.068
- Time
- 37.0s
- Tokens
- 2,339 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
CobuddymediumvsGPT-4o-mininoneGPT-5.5lowvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableCobuddymediumvsLing-2.6-flashnoneTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1TnoneClaude Fable 5mediumvsGPT-5.5lowGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.5lowCobuddymediumvsGPT-5.4 NanononeCobuddymediumvsQwen3.5-9BnoneCobuddymediumvsMiMo-V2.5none