#194 Cobuddy
medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Cobuddy vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads on average score with 5.1 vs 4.7. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.025. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 4.62s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 25.8%.
Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5It has the best score here (5.1), while responding about 8.6x faster than Cobuddy (medium).
Last updated at: 2026-07-21
| Metric | Cobuddy Cobuddy medium | MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.7 | 5.1 |
| Rank | #194 | #174 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 45.5% | 25.8% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 1 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.770 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.025 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.140 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.280 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 37,449 | 141,043 |
| Output Tokens | 1,677 | 16,464 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 116,703 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 39.90s | 4.62s |
| Response Time (max) | 309.02s | 55.36s |
| Response Time (total) | 797.98s | 101.57s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#174 MiMo-V2.5
none- Cost
- $0.007
- Time
- 267.4s
- Tokens
- 25,283 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Mistral Small 4mediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneCobuddymediumvsMercury 2noneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneCobuddymediumvsGPT-5.4 NanononeCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1TnoneCobuddymediumvsLing-2.6-flashnoneCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneCobuddymediumvsGPT-4o-mininoneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5lowvsMiMo-V2.5none