Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Summary

Cobuddy vs MiMo-V2.5 benchmark comparison: Cobuddy leads on average score with 5.6 vs 4.9. Cobuddy has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.007. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 2.20s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 27.0%.

Recommended model: MiMo-V2.5 - Its score stays close to the best score here (4.9 vs 5.6), while responding about 18.1x faster than Cobuddy.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.6 4.9
Rank #119 #143
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 27.0%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.413
Total Cost $0.000 $0.007
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 41,985
Output Tokens 1,677 2,267
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 2.20s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 6.86s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 46.21s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#119 Cobuddy

medium
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#143 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
MiMo-V2.5 3.5 8.0 16.7% 1 2.19s 645 282 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.36s 15,075 330 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
MiMo-V2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.01s 7,758 366 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 756ms 753 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
MiMo-V2.5 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 6.86s 498 81 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
MiMo-V2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 751ms 684 72 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
MiMo-V2.5 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 2.13s 678 166 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
MiMo-V2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.43s 8,238 231 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.89s 216 16 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair