Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

OpenAI: GPT-5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 9.3 vs 9.4. Qwen3.7 Max (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.523 vs $0.907. GPT-5.5 (low) is faster at 9.76s vs 16.02s, with pass rates of 85.7% vs 88.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 Max (medium)It has the best score here (9.4), while costing about 1.7x less than GPT-5.5 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22
Score 9.3 9.4
Rank #7 #4
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 85.7% 88.9%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 5.035 5.517
Total Cost $0.907 $0.523
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $3.750 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,209 42,360
Output Tokens 2,046 2,129
Reasoning Tokens 22,460 122,959
Response Time (avg) 9.76s 16.02s
Response Time (max) 56.19s 59.98s
Response Time (total) 204.92s 336.51s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#7 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

#4 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair