Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Claude Opus 5 (high) leads on average score with 9.2 vs 9.2. Qwen3.7 Max (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.116 vs $2.835. Claude Opus 5 (high) is faster at 20.44s vs 40.57s, with pass rates of 84.9% vs 87.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 Max (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (9.2 vs 9.2), while costing about 2.5x less than Claude Opus 5 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 high Release: 2026-07-25 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22
Score 9.2 9.2
Rank #11 #13
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.9% 87.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 15.747 8.292
Total Cost $2.835 $1.116
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,959 106,020
Output Tokens 67,066 5,748
Reasoning Tokens 19,114 211,004
Response Time (avg) 20.44s 40.57s
Response Time (max) 159.01s 556.06s
Response Time (total) 449.68s 892.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#11 Claude Opus 5

high
Cost
$0.265
Time
144.5s
Tokens
10,741 tok

#13 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.73s 10,590 7,547 1,721
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair