Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

The average score is effectively tied at 9.2 vs 9.2. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.361 vs $2.835. Claude Opus 5 (high) is faster at 20.44s vs 21.47s, with pass rates of 84.9% vs 90.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium)It has the best score here (9.2), while costing about 2.1x less than Claude Opus 5 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 high Release: 2026-07-25 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Release: 2026-02-19
Score 9.2 9.2
Rank #11 #10
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.9% 90.9%
Flaky tests 1 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 15.747 6.801
Total Cost $2.835 $1.361
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $12.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,959 92,287
Output Tokens 67,066 5,232
Reasoning Tokens 19,114 92,726
Response Time (avg) 20.44s 21.47s
Response Time (max) 159.01s 88.68s
Response Time (total) 449.68s 322.08s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#11 Claude Opus 5

high
Cost
$0.265
Time
144.5s
Tokens
10,741 tok

#10 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

medium
Cost
$0.115
Time
87.2s
Tokens
9,629 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.73s 10,590 7,547 1,721
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 7.9 9.9 66.7% 0 40.17s 8,124 435 41,247

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair