Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Max (medium) vs Grok 4.5 (high)

Qwen3.7 Max (medium) leads on average score with 9.1 vs 9.0. Qwen3.7 Max (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.157 vs $2.252. Qwen3.7 Max (medium) is faster at 44.32s vs 72.30s, with pass rates of 86.4% vs 86.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-29

Rank
#17
Total Output Tokens
226,102
Response Time (avg)
44.32s
Total Cost
$1.157
Rank
#21
Total Output Tokens
324,462
Response Time (avg)
72.30s
Total Cost
$2.252
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max (medium)

It has the best score here (9.1), while costing about 1.9x less than Grok 4.5 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22 Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 high Release: 2026-07-08
Score 9.1 9.0
Rank #17 #21
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.9
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 86.4% 86.4%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.904 12.565
Total Cost $1.157 $2.252
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,029 152,175
Output Tokens 5,748 5,655
Reasoning Tokens 220,354 318,807
Response Time (avg) 44.32s 72.30s
Response Time (max) 556.06s 676.83s
Response Time (total) 975.11s 1590.56s
Parameters ~1T total (~40B active) ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#17 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

#21 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5

high
Cost
$0.015
Time
29.7s
Tokens
2,737 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808
Grok 4.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 155.16s 9,579 357 100,752

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair