- Rank
- #19
- Total Output Tokens
- 125,316
- Response Time (avg)
- 38.97s
- Total Cost
- $4.163
GPT-5.5 (medium) vs Grok 4.5 (high)
The average score is effectively tied at 9.0 vs 9.0. Grok 4.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $2.252 vs $4.163. GPT-5.5 (medium) is faster at 38.97s vs 72.30s, with pass rates of 87.9% vs 86.4%.
- Rank
- #21
- Total Output Tokens
- 324,462
- Response Time (avg)
- 72.30s
- Total Cost
- $2.252
Recommended model
Grok 4.5 (high)
It has the best score here (9.0), while costing about 1.8x less than GPT-5.5 (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 medium | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Rank | #19 | #21 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 87.9% | 86.4% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 23.127 | 12.565 |
| Total Cost | $4.163 | $2.252 |
| Input Price | $5.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $30.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 80,668 | 152,175 |
| Output Tokens | 5,617 | 5,655 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 119,699 | 318,807 |
| Response Time (avg) | 38.97s | 72.30s |
| Response Time (max) | 332.10s | 676.83s |
| Response Time (total) | 857.43s | 1590.56s |
| Parameters | ~1.5T total (~100B active) | ~1.7T total (~170B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#19 GPT-5.5
medium- Cost
- $0.112
- Time
- 71.9s
- Tokens
- 3,807 tok
#21 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
high- Cost
- $0.015
- Time
- 29.7s
- Tokens
- 2,737 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Qwen3.8 MaxmediumvsGrok 4.5highGPT-5.3-CodexmediumvsGrok 4.5highGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highQwen3.7 MaxmediumvsGrok 4.5highSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsGPT-5.5mediumSeed 2.1 TurbohighvsGPT-5.5mediumSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsGrok 4.5highGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGrok 4.5highGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGPT-5.5mediumClaude Opus 5highvsGPT-5.5mediumClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGrok 4.5highGemini 3.7 FlashlowvsGPT-5.5medium