Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Summary

Cobuddy (medium) vs Qwen3.5-9B benchmark comparison: Qwen3.5-9B leads on average score with 5.1 vs 4.9. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.006. Qwen3.5-9B is faster at 1.89s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 20.6%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.5-9B - It has the best score here (5.1), while responding about 21.1x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-09

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02
Score 4.9 5.1
Rank #159 #154
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 20.6%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.123
Total Cost $0.000 $0.006
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 48,041
Output Tokens 1,677 3,952
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 1.89s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 6.03s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 39.68s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#159 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#154 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
Qwen3.5-9B 3.1 9.9 0.0% 0 1.71s 696 582 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 5.91s 20,397 1,255 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 847ms 7,788 249 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 464ms 789 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
Qwen3.5-9B 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 552ms 522 99 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
Qwen3.5-9B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 514ms 711 75 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
Qwen3.5-9B 3.2 10.0 0.0% 0 621ms 714 347 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.27s 8,301 273 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.32s 210 6 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair