Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Summary

MiniMax M2.7 (medium) vs Qwen3.5-9B benchmark comparison: MiniMax M2.7 (medium) leads on average score with 5.2 vs 5.1. Qwen3.5-9B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.006 vs $0.100. Qwen3.5-9B is faster at 1.89s vs 38.18s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 20.6%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.5-9B - Its score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.2), while costing about 18.5x less than MiniMax M2.7 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-09

Metric MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax M2.7 medium Release: 2026-03-18 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02
Score 5.2 5.1
Rank #146 #154
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.8 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 20.6%
Flaky tests 8 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 2.494 0.123
Total Cost $0.100 $0.006
Input Price $0.240 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.960 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,371 48,041
Output Tokens 8,981 3,952
Reasoning Tokens 89,812 0
Response Time (avg) 38.18s 1.89s
Response Time (max) 196.21s 6.03s
Response Time (total) 763.60s 39.68s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#146 MiniMax M2.7

medium
Cost
$0.022
Time
22.8s
Tokens
9,250 tok

#154 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 7.9 6.3 83.3% 2 40.32s 654 3,010 17,716
Qwen3.5-9B 3.1 9.9 0.0% 0 1.71s 696 582 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 5.7 9.1 33.3% 0 101.89s 2,961 1,231 38,841
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 4.7 1.6 66.7% 1 41.03s 14,233 369 4,480
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 5.91s 20,397 1,255 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 21.95s 7,152 187 5,882
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 847ms 7,788 249 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 19.00s 245 8 2,796
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 464ms 789 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 3.9 2.5 33.3% 1 38.70s 486 92 5,204
Qwen3.5-9B 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 552ms 522 99 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 3.8 5.8 33.3% 1 12.80s 687 350 2,600
Qwen3.5-9B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 514ms 711 75 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 5.9 7.2 55.6% 1 24.87s 675 362 7,840
Qwen3.5-9B 3.2 10.0 0.0% 0 621ms 714 347 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 4.7 1.6 66.7% 1 12.05s 7,067 304 1,001
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.27s 8,301 273 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 22.77s 211 3,068 3,452
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.32s 210 6 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair