Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T

Summary

Cobuddy vs Ling-2.6-1T benchmark comparison: Cobuddy leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.7. Cobuddy has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.005. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 7.72s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 14.3%.

Recommended model: Ling-2.6-1T - Its score stays close to the best score here (4.7 vs 4.9), while responding about 5.2x faster than Cobuddy.

Last updated at: 2026-06-12

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23
Score 4.9 4.7
Rank #144 #152
Reliability 10.0 N/A
Consistency 7.5 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 14.3%
Flaky tests 6 0
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.000 $0.005
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 34,905
Output Tokens 1,677 2,434
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 7.72s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 25.72s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 139.00s

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
Ling-2.6-1T 3.4 10.0 0.0% 0 6.55s 726 777 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 23.53s 9,030 183 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
Ling-2.6-1T 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.37s 8,313 285 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.04s 810 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
Ling-2.6-1T 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 20.34s 540 140 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
Ling-2.6-1T 6.4 10.0 50.0% 0 5.36s 732 81 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
Ling-2.6-1T 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 5.36s 729 131 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 25.72s 13,212 429 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair