指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #196 | Muse Glimmer 30B low | Meta | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.219 | 1/2 | 3.60s |
| #210 | Solar Pro 4 xhigh | Upstage | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.067 | 1/2 | 51.3s |
| #215 | Grok 4.7 high | X AI | 0.8 | 0.7 | $3.037 | 1/2 | 14.1s |
| #243 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B max | Reflection | 0.8 | 0.6 | $0.799 | 1/2 | 866ms |
| #248 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B low | Reflection | 0.8 | 0.6 | $0.432 | 1/2 | 1.14s |
| #381 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning low | NVIDIA | 0.8 | 0.5 | $0.175 | 1/2 | 5.46s |
| #252 | Dots 3 Note Preview high | Dots Studio | 0.8 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 7.80s |
| #331 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 0.8 | 0.5 | $0.105 | 1/2 | 4.78s |
| #367 | Mimo V2 Omni medium | Xiaomi | 0.8 | 0.5 | $0.683 | 1/2 | 4.99s |
| #185 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash low | Xiaomi | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.200 | 1/2 | 955ms |
| #54 | Muse Spark Open low | Meta | 0.8 | 0.9 | $0.600 | 1/2 | 10.3s |
| #214 | Solar Pro 4 low | Upstage | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 1/2 | 56.4s |
| #220 | Apodex 1.1 Mini high | Apodex | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 8.10s |
| #320 | Ling 3.1 Flash none | Inclusionai | 0.8 | 0.5 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 1.22s |
| #253 | Dots 3 Note Preview low | Dots Studio | 0.8 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 7.83s |